On Wed, 2011-09-07 at 18:38 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote: > On 7 September 2011 01:02, Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Is this a Bodhi bug? Or does FESCo expect voluntary compliance / > > case-by-case enforcement of this policy? > > I'm guilty of this too; when I file an update that's not getting > enough karma (after a few weeks) then I give it a spin in a *fresh* VM > and test it out like any normal user would do. If this is wrong, > consider my wrists slapped, but otherwise I think it makes sense and > gets things moving. It's against the current policy. I've argued along the same lines as you in past threads on this list, but I was on the minority side of the debate at the time, it seemed; more people were worried that maintainers would +1 their updates without bothering to test them properly. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
