On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 16:42 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > >> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > >> >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > >> >> > >> > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script > >> > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi > >> > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update > >> > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it. > >> > >> Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as > >> critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's > >> dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should > >> be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no > >> longer crit path and new things that are with each release. > > > > I'm not sure that's the intent of CRITPATH. I think the original > > definition was something on the order of "packages whose breakage can > > prevent the system from booting to a command prompt". > > > > If gnome-shell is broken, an admin can still get in on a virtual > > terminal or other window manager. > > I believe it was for the primary desktop as well. Otherwise I doubt > that things like libimobiledevice would be on that list :) Yes, critpath includes default desktop. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
