On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > >> > > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script > > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi > > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update > > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it. > > Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as > critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's > dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should > be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no > longer crit path and new things that are with each release. I'm not sure that's the intent of CRITPATH. I think the original definition was something on the order of "packages whose breakage can prevent the system from booting to a command prompt". If gnome-shell is broken, an admin can still get in on a virtual terminal or other window manager.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
