On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: >> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical >> >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? >> >> >> > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script >> > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi >> > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update >> > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it. >> >> Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as >> critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's >> dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should >> be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no >> longer crit path and new things that are with each release. > > I'm not sure that's the intent of CRITPATH. I think the original > definition was something on the order of "packages whose breakage can > prevent the system from booting to a command prompt". > > If gnome-shell is broken, an admin can still get in on a virtual > terminal or other window manager. I believe it was for the primary desktop as well. Otherwise I doubt that things like libimobiledevice would be on that list :) Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
