On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? >> > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it. Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no longer crit path and new things that are with each release. Peter -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
