On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi <a.badger@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote: > >> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical > >> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be? > >> > > We should get that corrected. notting has ben promising to get a script > > that integrates with mash and pushes the information into pkgdb where bodhi > > can then pull the information out. Maybe he'll be able to give us an update > > on that or see if someone else familiar with mash can work on it. > > Its not the only one that's missing what should likely be classed as > critpath, clutter should likely be added too because gnome-shell's > dependency on it. I think the review of the crit path packages should > be part of the release process. There's likely things that are no > longer crit path and new things that are with each release. If it isn't, there's a bug somewhere, as critpath generation should take dependencies into account - if gnome-shell actually depends on clutter, then clutter should be pulled into critpath automatically. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | identi.ca: adamwfedora http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
