Once upon a time, Matthew Garrett <mjg59@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> said: > "Configuration by", not overriding configuration. It's a mistake to have > your daemon's configuration be handled by a shell script that's sourced > into existing environment. You still have yet to cite your "sound technical arguments" for this. All I have seen so far is your opinion. > And that's a bad thing to do. You're sourcing your configuration in an > unsanitised environment. There's a huge number of ways that this can go > wrong depending on the admin's local configuration, which is clearly > undesirable. And an admin can break a config file. What is the difference? Please enumerate some of the "huge number of ways that this can go wrong" in real world examples (not made-up things like overriding IFS). -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
