Re: [fedora-arm] Fedora 15 ARM hardfp Virtual FAD (Fedora Activity Day) - FRIDAY

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2011-07-10 at 22:44 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:

> It's certainly true that we could do more to identify ftbfs situations 
> earlier, but we've had mass rebuilds in most recent releases. Random 
> failures years down the line really aren't a realistic concern.

I can think of specific cases where dependent packages failed to rebuild
6 months later because of an earlier change, and I'm sure we can find
some involving years at a time. Further, there are some noarch packages
that haven't been rebuilt in many releases, but that's another issue.

Jon.


-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux