Am 13.06.2011 19:33, schrieb David Malcolm: > It appears that you are unhappy and frustrated at the moment yes > One of Fedora's goals is to be a fast-moving distribution: systemd > offers significant improvements compared to previous init systems (for > me the integration with cgroups is particularly appealing). yes, but again: this is well for new installations but a automatic chnge of upgraded systems is bad and if is really bad if F14 users (6 months supported from now on) to be forced update to F15 systemd because their graphcis driver for F14 will not supported and Kernel 2.6.35 does also not support the network card from "Sandy Bridge" > It may be that there's no "good" way to make this hybrid work (for some > definition of "good" e.g. "minimizing the number of steps", "being > maintainable" etc) it is not really maintainable over 6 months because every moment upstream could change depecndencies which will not fit for F14 and you are sitting there with a kernel without security updates additionally a GLIBGC update is inasive because it is one of the core libraries and no F14 binary is tested/designed for this combination > and that the best way to make this hardware work is > to upgrade to Fedora 15. It seems that you are unhappy with that, and > your unhappiness with that seems to stem from unhappiness with systemd. yes because i have a brand new hardware (the old one was unuseable)and "systemd" was the reason to not install F15 THIS TIME to have a buffer playing on a test-system with F15/systemd so now i have the options of a upgrade to F15 while much work, hughe health troubles and 2 weeks holidays are priority one in my life this time the other option is that one network card will not work and graphics performacne while moving a windows feels like 10 years ago and sometimes the desktop freezes for some seconds or minutes
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
