On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:59 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Am 12.06.2011 18:56, schrieb drago01: >> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:55 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>> >>> Am 12.06.2011 18:53, schrieb drago01: >>>> On Sun, Jun 12, 2011 at 6:45 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> >>>> upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to install >>>> and use it. >>> >>> and why in the world is systemd forced after a upgrade via yum where >>> upstart was in use before - upgrades should left core configurations >>> in peace! >> >> Upgrade usually means progress not stagnation, if you want to stay in >> the past don't upgrade. > > you said "upstart is still maintained and shipped, you should be able to > install and use it" - so how and why damned must be a init-replace > in a early state forced on a existing system? That was the case in F14, now we are making the switch. For people that for whatever reasons want upstart it is still here. But for the rest we move on ... But please don't start yet another systemd flamewar we had enough of them. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
