Re: [FHS] helper scripts location

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 7:44 PM, Richard W.M. Jones <rjones@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 08:43:46AM -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>> On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 13:41 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> > On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 02:18:18PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> > > What is the benefit of a separate libexecdir?
>> >
>> > I guess because binaries shouldn't go in the library directory.
>> >
>> > Now if you wanted to get rid of the {,/usr}/lib64 nonsense, *that*'s
>> > something we can all get behind ...
>>
>> How would you handle multilib and how would you transition stuff ?
>
> Shooting multilib in the head and just using 64 bit everywhere?

You only getting 32bit libs / apps when you install them so no reason
to get rid of them and make life harder for those who need them.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux