Re: ABRT opt-out (was Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo meeting)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 18:24 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 12/09/2010 06:11 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 17:36 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> >
> >> so, can we call the RFE: "attach backtrace even when dupe is found" ?
> >
> > or, cooler, 'attach backtrace even when dupe is found *if current
> > backtrace is better than any already attached to the bug*'.
> 
> Adam, that would require downloading all the bt from the bugzilla to the 
> user and do some comparing on his side (this would be nice to have in 
> bz) ... but it is doable...

well, at present it would. you could finesse this, though. abrt could
mark any incomplete bt it uploads in a BZ comment, so it would then be
able to tell if the bt(s) already attached to a bug are complete or
incomplete from the comment.
-- 
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org
http://www.happyassassin.net

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux