On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote: > On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make >> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once >> (or some other threshold):) > > Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented? > > JBG yes, but those bugs are usually the reason why maintainers are complaining about ABRT.. reporter doesn't know how to reproduce, devel doesn't know either so the bug stays open until the release EOL without any progress and both maintainer and reporter are just frustrated they had to spend time on it... on the other hand I agree that silencing ABRT is not a way to go, I'd rather see some ideas/hints of how to improve the reports for specific packages so devels are willing to look at them... e.g.: If evo is added to blacklist without any hints how to make ABRT reports usable for evo (yes I have few and they should be in F15), then it will just stay in the blacklist forever and nothing gets improved.. and after some time we'll have 99% of the packages blacklisted because it's just sooo convenient ... -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
