On 12/09/2010 01:27 PM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 12/09/2010 01:08 PM, "JÃhann B. GuÃmundsson" wrote: >> On 12/09/2010 09:59 AM, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>> Just a wild idea - ABRT detects the dupes even locally so we can make >>> ABRT to allow reporting the bug to bz only if it happened more then once >>> (or some other threshold):) >> >> Dont we loose hard to catch odd ball bugs if that's implemented? >> >> JBG > > yes, but those bugs are usually the reason why maintainers are > complaining about ABRT.. Reporters also complain about this for the same reason: Reporters who are facing an ABRT alert, which complains about missing 179 debuginfos (+ have to contact their sys admin to become root and run debuginfo-install), who then notice that debuginfo-install installs only 21 debuginfos, just to be finally able to submit a report, then notice this report is worthless (no reproducer) and thus is very likely to be will be ignored, isn't helpful to users either and drives them away from ABRT. Ralf -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel