Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 11/20/2010 06:02 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:

> That's not what I'm talking about. There have been multiple instances
> where updates have been pushed that were *completely broken*: they could
> not work at all, in any fashion, for anyone. It doesn't happen a lot,
> but it happens; enough to prove that not all maintainers test updates
> before pushing them.

Just to provide some examples, here are the bugzilla entries for a 
package that didn't  even start up 
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=591213), and another one 
for a package that crashed on a first elementary operation
(https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454045)
FYI, I fixed the latter, and the former is still there in Fedora 14.

Hopefully AutoQA will solve many of those problems, if we can come up 
with test cases and a method to check elementary GUI operation.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux