On Fri, 19 Nov 2010 22:04:24 -0800 Adam Williamson <awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: ...snip... > > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277 > > hum, that wasn't well publicised, and I wasn't aware of it. (I should > probably show up to more FESCo meetings...picture FESCo members going > 'no, no, really, it's fine!') I'd disagree, for the reasons above. Well, my thought on it is: * As maintainer, shouldn't you be testing your updates already? Granted there's often no way you could test everything, but at least installing it and confirming the bug(s) you claim are fixed are fixed? * Having just one pair of eyes (even if they are exceptionally talented ones) can lead to things slipping through. I know personally I have messed up and tested something, confirmed the bug was fixed, then due to one of: trying to clean up the commit before building without another test cycle, testing on a machine with different package versions, etc the update I push out is not the one that really fixes the issues or introduces some other issue. Unless you have a really really good test workflow this kind of thing can happen. We can surely revisit this if folks like... but if we do, we might consider for non critpath packages just re-enabling a 'push to stable', as thats what it would allow with less clicking. ;) kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
