On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester > > manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop > > denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of > > critical packages, for which there might be some hope of it actually > > working as designed. > > BTW, another point worth noting is that there is not actually a specific > rule against +1ing your own updates. It's 'frowned upon', I guess, but > actually I think it's probably workable to say it's fine for the > developer to +1 their own update in Bodhi: *as long as you actually have > tested it*. For non-critpath updates especially. The Bodhi system is > essentially an honor system anyway. So how I'd see this working is if it > becomes clear that some maintainer is gaming the system by just +1ing > everything they submit, even if it actually turns out to be broken, we > look at saying they can't +1 their own updates any more. But if you > actually are conscientiously testing your own updates, that's probably > worth a +1 in Bodhi, for me. The ability to +1 your own updates was disapproved by FESCo, and will be disabled in a future version of bodhi. https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277 luke -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
