On Tue, 2010-11-16 at 17:22 -0500, Luke Macken wrote: > On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 11:46:36AM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Fri, 2010-11-12 at 14:32 -0500, Tom Lane wrote: > > > > > It's absolutely crystal clear to me that we don't have enough tester > > > manpower to make the current policy workable; it's past time to stop > > > denying that. I'd suggest narrowing the policy to a small number of > > > critical packages, for which there might be some hope of it actually > > > working as designed. > > > > BTW, another point worth noting is that there is not actually a specific > > rule against +1ing your own updates. It's 'frowned upon', I guess, but > > actually I think it's probably workable to say it's fine for the > > developer to +1 their own update in Bodhi: *as long as you actually have > > tested it*. For non-critpath updates especially. The Bodhi system is > > essentially an honor system anyway. So how I'd see this working is if it > > becomes clear that some maintainer is gaming the system by just +1ing > > everything they submit, even if it actually turns out to be broken, we > > look at saying they can't +1 their own updates any more. But if you > > actually are conscientiously testing your own updates, that's probably > > worth a +1 in Bodhi, for me. > > The ability to +1 your own updates was disapproved by FESCo, and will be > disabled in a future version of bodhi. > > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277 hum, that wasn't well publicised, and I wasn't aware of it. (I should probably show up to more FESCo meetings...picture FESCo members going 'no, no, really, it's fine!') I'd disagree, for the reasons above. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
