On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 03:54 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > There's exactly one constructive thing to do, it's repealing this set of > policies (Critical Path and Update Acceptance Criteria) in its entirety. > > An update should go stable when the maintainer says so, karma should be > purely informational feedback for the maintainer. I disagree. The evidence you cite does not support this conclusion. We implemented the policies for three releases. There are significant problems with one release. This does not justify the conclusion that the policies should be entirely repealed. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
