Re: The new Update Acceptance Criteria are broken

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



David Nalley wrote:
> I think this is an interesting idea, but I'll also say I think it can
> be made simpler. Why not just hold package maintainers accountable
> period. Make them accountable to FESCo (which in theory they are to
> begin with) If I, as a package maintainer continuously want to 'push
> directly to stable' and continuously screw it up, I'd hope FESCo and
> my original sponsor would at least tell me I am doing it wrong.

+1

Let people use their brains. If they screw up, yell at them, and work on 
informing people in a better way so such mistakes don't happen again.

Bureaucracy is not the right solution to prevent mistakes, education is.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux