Re: systemd and changes

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thursday, August 26, 2010, 3:17:52 PM, Jeff wrote:

> On Thu, Aug 26, 2010 at 10:29 AM, Jon Masters <jonathan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> Great. It works fine on a laptop, in general. But on a
>> desktop/server/workstation that is connected for weeks at a time (like
>> mine), I don't want to have to do clicky buttony stuff just to make my
>> network work. Nothing has yet proved as simple as the "network" scripts,
>> though I'm sure we could shove in a few layers of
>> g-whatever-it's-called-now-conf for good measure.

> Just to be clear.. its the clickity nature of the initial system wide
> configuration that is the barrier for you? if you had a reasonable
> non-clickity way to add a system wide on-boot activated network
> controlled networkmanager via cli would that suffice?

> -jef

Let's  not  forget that NM is not suitable for someone running a local
DNS  server  (bind  with DNSSEC enabled). It also does not work at all
when used on a laptop as a caching DNS.

There  is a F14^H^H^HF15 feature to make NM work with bind and DSNSEC.
I  look  forward to it - my girlfriend's ISP's DNS servers can take up
to  10  seconds  to resolve an address, and occasionally simply do not
resolve legit URLs.

Al

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux