Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > The current approach of trying to force maintainers to accept patches > > simply does not work. > > The only reason it doesn't work is that our organizational structure is not > built to make this work. But why should it be made to work? Why should the KDE SIG be able to force the kernel maintainers to take a patch? What if that patch conflicts with one another SIG wants - who "wins" (if you can call it winning)? SIGs should stick to their area of expertise. The KDE SIG should work on KDE packages and not assume they know what's best for the rest of the distribution. -- Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx> Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
