Re: "Staying close to upstream"

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



 On 08/13/2010 09:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> No.  No SIG's have any authority whatsoever over individual package
>> maintainers outside the packages the team maintains.  No one needs to
>> "comply" with your requirements.
> That's exactly Fedora's organizational problem.
>
> KDE SIG should have authority over anything KDE-related. 

You are calling a lot of things including the kernel and Firefox KDE
related even though KDE Spin does not even include Firefox by default. 
In other words, you want a organization policy that lets you dictate to
other maintainers what patches they should merge even if the packages
are only tangentially related such as Firefox.  This is ultimately a
power grab and not healthy and will never be acceptable.  Besides,  you
repeatedly refer to the "KDE SIG" but KDE SIG has made no formal request
to the Firefox maintainers.    I can't accept that you represent all of
KDE SIG's viewpoint in this matter.  This appears just your person view
points. 

Rahul
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux