On 08/13/2010 09:17 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> No. No SIG's have any authority whatsoever over individual package >> maintainers outside the packages the team maintains. No one needs to >> "comply" with your requirements. > That's exactly Fedora's organizational problem. > > KDE SIG should have authority over anything KDE-related. You are calling a lot of things including the kernel and Firefox KDE related even though KDE Spin does not even include Firefox by default. In other words, you want a organization policy that lets you dictate to other maintainers what patches they should merge even if the packages are only tangentially related such as Firefox. This is ultimately a power grab and not healthy and will never be acceptable. Besides, you repeatedly refer to the "KDE SIG" but KDE SIG has made no formal request to the Firefox maintainers. I can't accept that you represent all of KDE SIG's viewpoint in this matter. This appears just your person view points. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel