Re: The slip down memory lane

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Thu, 12.08.10 13:19, Mike McGrath (mmcgrath@xxxxxxxxxx) wrote:

> Since 2006 I counted 18 slips (I think one or two of those may just be a
> single slip listed twice).  Lets not yell, lets not flame war, lets not
> point fingers.  How can we fix this?  It's clearly not one group or one
> individual or we'd just go talk to them.  This is a collective failure.
> 
> Since 2006 we've slipped at least 16-18 weeks by my count. That's more
> than half of a full release cycle.

While I side with mclasen here and believe that it is a strength of
Fedora that we take the liberty to let cycles slip rather then
compromise quality, I want to mention one thing: on opensuse the "base"
system has a different schedule then the rest of the OS. i.e. the
kernel, gcc, glibc and the low-level tools freeze first, while
everything else may be hacked on a couple of weeks more. Maybe that's
something to adopt for Fedora as well?

Lennart

-- 
Lennart Poettering - Red Hat, Inc.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel


[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux