Jesse Keating wrote: > So this is kind of funny. You'd rather see testing become/less/ > rigorous as the age of a release grows, and you want the most rigorous > testing done in rawhide. That's quite the opposite of what many of us > are trying to work toward, that is as the release moves from rawhide > into branched into released into released-1 the testing gets harder, and > the chance of breakage gets lower. Users of older releases aren't there > for the fun of it, they need to get real work done, and don't want > updates to get in their way of accomplishing that. We should be more > careful with our older release than anything else. No, I was stating fact - not opinion. Older releases receive less testing. Bodhi metrics show it if you want something tangible besides my words. > > So I'd love to have multi-level policy, but in my opinion it should get > harder and harder to push an update as the release gets older, not > easier. We can't rely on one tester to be able to test older releases through a stringent policy, can we? It's common sense that older releases should be receiving more testing, but here in reality it is the opposite. If I am wrong, please prove it. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
