Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 15.03.2010 18:15, schrieb Rahul Sundaram:
>
> You did read it incorrectly.  Splitting up the update stream doesn't
> involve going back to core+extras at all.   KDE has a additional repo
> already in kde-redhat.sf.net where they have first builds before they
> get into the official updates repo.. 
Sorry, from my point of view this is not a solution for KDE.

If you may take an update on KDE, this may indicate an update of Qt
which cause additionally depended updates on other packages like
stellarium or luma. So the main issue is to coordinate the updates of
all of this packages to avoid failing applications by the end-user.

Best Regards:

Jochen Schmitt
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iJwEAQECAAYFAkuehDAACgkQZLAIBz9lVu+/7AQAiKU/GNV9Tx610KNVWamUtuXs
HtjKLTIXCY7yJ7ysOcA5lUkb2zHHqQ7MkExGh36laVi0I1fh96KUGG4khVOoaUC6
p18xWCDX3TWYFSGq9x3OmgvurF/vYXMkTuRR4VQcbbcbUaCxNE/m7/WpxYl5DdbO
aOL6oWywKfU5zXXSf1U=
=bcOt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux