Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/15/2010 05:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> Progressive and aggressive is all fine as part of development branches
> as far as I am concerned.  Several other distributions take care of this
> disjoint nature by splitting up the repository and having two different
> update streams.  With a smaller amount of additional maintenance burden,
> we can do this as well.
Your claim is self-contradictory: Additional repos mean additional 
maintenance burden and additional complexity.

Or did I read your request incorrectly and you are proposing to 
reintroduce a Core+Extra's split?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux