On 03/15/2010 10:37 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 03/15/2010 05:36 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > >> Progressive and aggressive is all fine as part of development branches >> as far as I am concerned. Several other distributions take care of this >> disjoint nature by splitting up the repository and having two different >> update streams. With a smaller amount of additional maintenance burden, >> we can do this as well. >> > Your claim is self-contradictory: Additional repos mean additional > maintenance burden and additional complexity. > Err, where is the contradiction? I did clear point out that there is a additional maintenance burden involved in this but if there is a necessity for faster updates, it will happen anyway and it already has elsewhere for various reasons. > Or did I read your request incorrectly and you are proposing to > reintroduce a Core+Extra's split? > You did read it incorrectly. Splitting up the update stream doesn't involve going back to core+extras at all. KDE has a additional repo already in kde-redhat.sf.net where they have first builds before they get into the official updates repo.. Accommodating such workflows within the Fedora infrastructure would allow people who want to move a newer KDE in older versions, the choice to do so more easily. Rahul -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
