Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> If you don't even agree with a basic principle that breaking ABI should be
> avoided in updates, we don't really have much left to discuss.

I don't see this as being a "basic principle" at all. For an enterprise 
distro like RHEL or CentOS, sure. But not for something like Fedora. What 
counts is that all software in Fedora depending on the library gets rebuilt 
and pushed at the same time. (That's what grouped updates are for.) We do 
not support third-party software.

        Kevin Kofler

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux