Re: Stable Release Updates types proposal (was Re: Fedora Board Meeting Recap 2010-03-11)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> I don't see this as being a "basic principle" at all. For an enterprise 
> distro like RHEL or CentOS, sure. But not for something like Fedora. What 
> counts is that all software in Fedora depending on the library gets rebuilt 
> and pushed at the same time. (That's what grouped updates are for.) We do 
> not support third-party software.

There's a difference between not supporting third-party software (is
that actually documented somewhere or another Kevin Kofler rule?) and
intentionally breaking it.

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux