On Thu, 2010-03-04 at 16:43 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > > We already have systems for checking common guideline compliance > > problems and things like dependency issues within a single > > repository; we don't have tools for doing this across a bunch of > > separate quasi-independent repos. > > Do you really think making repoclosure do its thing over a group of > repos instead of a single repo is a mountainous task? Yes, obviously > we'd have to change some tools. That's why I said "Obviously this would > require some tools work". My point was more that if there doesn't seem to be any particular advantage of the 'forest-of-separate-repos' approach, it's work for no gain. I see your point about providing multiple repos for some projects...I'm not sure whether it's something that would turn out to be terribly useful in practice, but hey, maybe we should ask some of the bigger SIGs and see what they think. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
