On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:09 +0100, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:02:51AM -0500, James Antill wrote: > > If we had less updates, that changed less things and required more > > testing before pushing them to users ... this would be entirely > > possible. > > Less updates mean more changes per update or you have more buggy > packages, because updates usually fix bugs. As I would assume any programmer knows: Not all bugs are created equal. Trading "no regressions" for "some minor bugs still remain" is a trade lots of users are happy to make (see: every customer of every piece of commercial software, ever). -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/releases http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/whatsnew/3.2.27 http://yum.baseurl.org/wiki/YumMultipleMachineCaching -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
