Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:48:18AM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 17:09 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:02:51AM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> > >  If we had less updates, that changed less things and required more
> > > testing before pushing them to users ... this would be entirely
> > > possible.
> > 
> > Less updates mean more changes per update or you have more buggy
> > packages, because updates usually fix bugs.
> 
>  As I would assume any programmer knows: Not all bugs are created equal.
> Trading "no regressions" for "some minor bugs still remain" is a trade
> lots of users are happy to make (see: every customer of every piece of
> commercial software, ever).

But this is why I am not using a commercial version of Fedora (RHEL),
but a FOSS distribution. And here the relationship differs a lot than
the relationship between non-FOSS vendors and clients, so the Microsoft
/ Windows User relationship does not hold. Is there even a way to report
bugs to Microsoft? At least there is no way to submit patches. And I am
pretty sure that minor bugs usually remain in commercial software,
because the vendor does not care to put money/effort into fixing them.
This also happens in FOSS, but then often patches are accepted.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpoDFY4RmW0C.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux