Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Williamson (awilliam@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> On Tue, 2010-03-02 at 17:52 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 02:33 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > But the problem is what to do if the testing ALREADY failed. Then the best 
> > > strategy is to fix the problem ASAP, bypassing testing this time, to get the 
> > > regression out of the way.
> > 
> > So testing failed, ergo the best way to fix it is to bypass the testing
> > all together?  Really?
> 
> Don't worry, Muttley! I'm sure we've nailed it THIS time! What could
> possibly go wrong?

Yes, because having things like http://rhn.redhat.com/errata/RHSA-1999-052.html
always provides a better experience for your users.

Bill
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux