Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 11:02:51AM -0500, James Antill wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-03-03 at 07:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:

> > No, because updates may depend on previous updates to work properly. We 
> > can't possibly test or support all possible combinations of updates.
> 
>  We can't _now_ ... because of packagers like you who want to release
> lots of updates with no or almost no testing!

Afaics, nobody objected to test updates more. But afaics they only
support so far is %check in SPEC builds, which is not much support after
all. But with AutoQA this will become better.

>  If we had less updates, that changed less things and required more
> testing before pushing them to users ... this would be entirely
> possible.

Less updates mean more changes per update or you have more buggy
packages, because updates usually fix bugs.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgp9vAmAWn5dq.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux