Re: Worthless updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:37:14PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> actually works (i.e. if it doesn't lead to maintainers only caring about the 
> conservative stream).

Packagers would then have the choice, I think this can only be a good
thing. Right now they have the choice, but the user cannot know what
the packager choosed. If somebody wants more stable updates or more 
uptodate package than what the maintainer want, this could be a scenario 
where co-maintaining is a good option with different co-maintainers caring 
more about one or the other stream.

--
Pat
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux