Re: Worthless updates

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:45:02PM +0100, Patrice Dumas wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 05:37:14PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > actually works (i.e. if it doesn't lead to maintainers only caring about the 
> > conservative stream).
> 
> Packagers would then have the choice, I think this can only be a good
> thing. Right now they have the choice, but the user cannot know what
> the packager choosed. If somebody wants more stable updates or more 
> uptodate package than what the maintainer want, this could be a scenario 
> where co-maintaining is a good option with different co-maintainers caring 
> more about one or the other stream.

This came to my mind, too.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgpWz530V12tY.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux