On 3/3/2010 2:51, Till Maas wrote: > On Tue, Mar 02, 2010 at 09:07:29PM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > How about we keep updates and updates-testing more like they are and add > another repo like updates-stable that follows your policy and is the > only updates repo enabled by default. Splitting the updates repos into "updates-testing," "updates-probably-stable," "updates-stable," "updates-really-stable," or whatever doesn't solve the problem. Not only would the choice of what is on by default remain the only distinction of significance, but it would also subdivide Fedora releases in a way that prevents bugs that are fixed with version upgrades from reaching most users. If we want to go down that road we might as well write a yum plugin that installs updates only if they meet a user-set karma threshold. At least then we wouldn't have repo proliferation. -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
