On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote: > On Wed, Mar 03, 2010 at 08:42:57AM -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > >> On Wed, 3 Mar 2010, Till Maas wrote: > >>> Are there even any metrics about how many bad updates happened? For me >>> bug that can be fixed issuing an update are a lot more than regressions >>> with updates or new bugs introduced with updates. If updates are slowed >>> down, this will get even worse. Especially because the proposal is to >>> use time instead of test coverage as the criterion to push an update to >>> stable. >> >> Actually the proposal is time AND test coverage. > > I mind have misunderstood it, but afaics it only says that it will be > tested, because it spent time in updates-testing, but this is not even > true nowadays, even if packages stay long in updates-testing. Having more time opens us up to more testing days and in the near future autoqa to help us bounce obviously bad things. -sv -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
