Re: fedora-release-rawhide, et. al.

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 15:33 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Jesse Keating (jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > On Fri, 2010-02-26 at 12:18 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > > 
> > > Mainly, it removes the repository definitions in rawhide that don't make
> > > sense - the release, updates, updates-testing, etc. repos won't work anyway
> > > unless you change $releasever in some way. 
> > 
> > It would help making the transition from rawhide to branched.  Once
> > we've branched, the use could just do: yum --disablerepo=rawhide
> > --enablerepo=fedora update and get moved over to the branched release.
> 
> No, because $releasever after you've branched is set to the post-branched
> release.
> 
> Bill


I'm talking about the time after we branched, but before the user has
updated to the new rawhide set.  The time where their fedora release
version is still that of the branched version.

Also fixable with releasever= if they've gone too far.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux