Re: FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call for feedback)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 26, 2010 at 09:08:38PM +0100, drago01 wrote:

> And a packagemaintainer should be able to judge whether the package is
> worth pushing or not.
> "It has a higher version number" can't be the reason for that. (and I
> don't see how anyone can disagree with this but well ...)

This leads to the question why did upstream create a new release? If it
is a complex software without proper testing at upstream and it handles
important data like mail, then the decision is completely different to
some other simple software that does many releases with small changes
that can easily be tested.

Regards
Till

Attachment: pgp5cGZO5MO5v.pgp
Description: PGP signature

-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux