Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 15:04:06 -0800,
  John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Going forward, there should be a -libs package (and probably a -devel package)
> and its use should be encouraged (instead of lzma source), particularly for
> new uses.  Probably it is too difficult to force _all_ existing uses of lzma
> source to convert to using -libs.  The reasons have to do with ten years
> of history: the original author of lzma resisted providing libraries,
> the internal interfaces changed too rapidly, the original licensing
> was too restrictive, etc.  Today http://7-zip.org/sdk.html says
> "LZMA SDK is placed in the public domain".

That is the standard stuff. What I was really asking is if there should
be a source package so that upx could be built without having a second
copy of the SDK in another srpm?
-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux