lzma itself already replaced by xz-lzma-compat several months ago.
xz-lzma-compat provides lzma=5.
在2010-02-13 02:10:23，"Milos Jakubicek" <xjakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道： >Oh, I didn't really notice how your repoquery looks like before. >Libarchive is ok, but there are others: > > >repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps lzma lzma-libs lzma-devel >--enablerepo=rawhide >rpm-build-0:4.7.1-6.fc12.x86_64 >rpm-build-0:4.8.0-9.fc13.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-25.fc12.x86_64 >autoarchive-0:0.1.2-2.fc12.noarch >rpm-build-0:4.7.2-1.fc12.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-22.fc12.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-26.fc13.x86_64 >man-0:1.6f-24.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 >lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 >lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 > >...which need to be sorted out. > >CC'ing autoarchive, man and rpm maintainers: > >Ivana, Panu, Fabian: are your packages able to use xz instead? >(I guess in case of rpm this is just a relict, right?) > >In all cases the lzma dependency is hardcoded, can hopefully be just >removed. > >If yes, I can retire lzma as soon as we branch F13. > >Milos > >On 12.2.2010 18:35, Chen Lei wrote: >> In fact libarchive doesn't require lzma-libs any more in F12 and F13. >> For F11: >> repoquery --whatrequires libarchive.so.2 >> PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.9-1.fc11.i586 >> libarchive-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 >> kdeutils-6:4.2.2-4.fc11.i586 >> PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586 >> libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586 >> Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged). >> >> 在2010-02-13 01:02:56，"Milos Jakubicek" <xjakub@xxxxxxxxxx <mailto:xjakub@xxxxxxxxxx>> 写道： >>>Hi Chen, >>> >>>On 12.2.2010 12:50, Chen Lei wrote: >>>> I realized from "http://tukaani.org/xz/" the core of the xz utils >>>> compression code is based on LZMA SDK <http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>, but >>>> it has been modified quite a lot to be suitable for XZ Utils. >>>> So I think we should ship lzma sdk for fedora in parallel with xz utils >>>> and p7zip. Since xz utils are the successor to lzma utils, maybe lzma >>>> utils can be safely retired in fedora. >>> >>>Retiring lzma (completely) is a long-term plan, yes (I'm the maintainer >>>of it). Not sure about the right time -- F14? >>> >>>I'll talk to the libarchive maintainer -- any other objections against >>>the plan to retire lzma for F14? >>> >>>Milos >> >> >> >> >> >
-- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
