On Fri, 12 Feb 2010, Milos Jakubicek wrote: > Oh, I didn't really notice how your repoquery looks like before. > Libarchive is ok, but there are others: > >> repoquery --whatrequires --alldeps lzma lzma-libs lzma-devel > --enablerepo=rawhide > rpm-build-0:4.7.1-6.fc12.x86_64 > rpm-build-0:4.8.0-9.fc13.x86_64 > man-0:1.6f-25.fc12.x86_64 > autoarchive-0:0.1.2-2.fc12.noarch > rpm-build-0:4.7.2-1.fc12.x86_64 > man-0:1.6f-22.fc12.x86_64 > man-0:1.6f-26.fc13.x86_64 > man-0:1.6f-24.fc12.x86_64 > lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 > lzma-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 > lzma-libs-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 > lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.x86_64 > lzma-devel-0:4.32.7-3.fc12.i686 > > ...which need to be sorted out. > > CC'ing autoarchive, man and rpm maintainers: > > Ivana, Panu, Fabian: are your packages able to use xz instead? > (I guess in case of rpm this is just a relict, right?) Yup, the rpm-build dependency on "lzma" is for the command line utility for uncompressing lzma compressed sources and patches. Hmm... and actually in current rawhide the lzma dependency is plain bogus %__lzma just points to xz: # Deprecated, use %__xz instead. %__lzma %__xz --format=lzma I'll kill off the unnecessary dependency. - Panu - -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
