Re: No lzma sdk in fedora

["Chen Lei" <supercyper@xxxxxxx>]

 In fact libarchive doesn't require lzma-libs any more in F12 and F13.

For F11:

repoquery --whatrequires libarchive.so.2
PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.9-1.fc11.i586
libarchive-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586
kdeutils-6:4.2.2-4.fc11.i586
PackageKit-glib-0:0.4.6-8.fc11.i586
libarchive-devel-0:2.6.2-1.fc11.i586
Updating libarchive to the F12 only affects a few stuffs(soname unchanged). 

在2010-02-13 01:02:56，"Milos Jakubicek" <xjakub@xxxxxxxxxx> 写道：
>Hi Chen,
>
>On 12.2.2010 12:50, Chen Lei wrote:
>> I realized from "http://tukaani.org/xz/"  the core of the xz utils
>> compression code is based on LZMA SDK <http://7-zip.org/sdk.html>, but
>> it has been modified quite a lot to be suitable for XZ Utils.
>> So I think we should ship lzma sdk for fedora in parallel with xz utils
>> and p7zip. Since xz utils are the successor to lzma utils, maybe lzma
>> utils can be safely retired in fedora.
>
>Retiring lzma (completely) is a long-term plan, yes (I'm the maintainer 
>of it). Not sure about the right time -- F14?
>
>I'll talk to the libarchive maintainer -- any other objections against 
>the plan to retire lzma for F14?
>
>Milos




-- 
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel