On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 13:34:48 -0800, John Reiser <jreiser@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Another related note is that someone wanted a src package for it because > > they had something that would only build with access to the source. I am > > not planning on providing that, but wanted people to be aware we had a request > > for it. > > The package that needs the src is the upx package. The coupling > is very strong, therefore a physical copy of the entire specific > version of lzma source was put into the source for Fedora's upx. > The URL for that lzma source was recorded, but not used as a SourceN:. > It is expected that the URL will become stale. Do you think packaging that as a subpackage is worth while? A couple of other packages seem to do that kind of thing? Where is an appropriate location to put the source? Is a buildrequires on a package that provides source allowed for packaging? -- devel mailing list devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
