Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:36:24 -0600, Eric wrote:
>
>> Patrice Dumas wrote:
>>> On Fri, Feb 12, 2010 at 02:59:37PM -0600, Eric Sandeen wrote:
>>>> I've finally been sufficiently pestered to fix this ;)
>>>>
>>>> Is anybody using any of these static libs from e2fsprogs?
>>>>
>>>> -%{_libdir}/libe2p.a
>>>> -%{_libdir}/libext2fs.a
>>>> -%{_libdir}/libcom_err.a
>>>> -%{_libdir}/libss.a
>>>>
>>>> I'm inclined to just remove them rather than making a -static
>>>> package, unless anyone needs them.
>>> Packages in fedora using those would have been breaking the guidelines
>> Sure but then e2fsprogs has been doing just that for too long as well ;)
>>
>>> quite badly. The issue is whether any user of fedora uses them for
>>> development.
>> For that I'm inclined to drop the libs and people can ask if they need them.
>>
>> We default to "no," right ...
>>
>> -Eric
>
> If you're still following this thread, there's a patch attached, which
> is relevant to you.
thanks, I just committed the removal but forgot about the provides.
Will fix up.
-Eric
> It removes the virtual -static packages and fixes the scriptlets.
>
> Non-fatal POSTUN scriptlet failure in rpm package e2fsprogs-libs
> Cleanup : 2:vim-minimal-7.2.315-2.fc13.i686 555/658
> /sbin/ldconfig: relative path `1' used to build cache
> warning: %postun(e2fsprogs-libs-1.41.9-9.fc13.i686) scriptlet failed, exit status 1
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
