On Thu, Aug 6, 2009 at 8:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Thu, 2009-08-06 at 19:07 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> >> Its kinda funny how the GNOME side is ending up on the 'conservative' >> side here. We are pretty agressive in pushing new stuff into each >> release. But we believe it is better to do that _before_ the release, >> not after. > > Right, aggressive between Fedora releases, conservative within a Fedora > release. I kind of wish everybody did that, and actually treated our > stable releases as, you know, stable releases, otherwise what's the > point of even making releases, and going through freezes and feature > processes and... > I believe that is the way it should be. The releases must be there every once in a while when the installer is updated, e.g.. when the default file system is changed, or when gnome is finally obsoleted etc. Otherwise F10=F11 until the last day of F-10's lifetime, in my perspective. It's just my opinion, as I don't maintain any core components and there might be things that I'm not considering. Orcan -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
