On Fri, 2009-05-29 at 11:02 -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > > On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > >>> The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group > >>> in graphical installers > >> > >> although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe > >> because they are merged! > >> I guess there is an option for hidden groups > >> > > > > Have these packages: > > > > Provides: policy(adult content) > > > > And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has: > > > > Conflicts: policy(adult content) > > > > /me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate. > > Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not. > > Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over > the distro and diluting the value of the tag. > > Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides > tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then > I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to: > > - firefox > - yum > - sword > - gnome-sword yum ? Simo. -- Simo Sorce * Red Hat, Inc * New York -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
