On Fri, May 29, 2009 at 11:02:23AM -0400, Seth Vidal wrote: > > > On Fri, 29 May 2009, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > >On 05/29/2009 02:10 AM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote: > >>>The problem with a comps group is that it will lead to having a group > >>>in graphical installers > >> > >>although in ojuba we use ourown comps files, but this is a catastrophe > >>because they are merged! > >>I guess there is an option for hidden groups > >> > > > >Have these packages: > > > >Provides: policy(adult content) > > > >And have a package that's mandatory in your respin that has: > > > >Conflicts: policy(adult content) > > > >/me taking one of the good ideas from the flag debate. > > Except it is obvious that something contains a flag or not. > > Labeling certain content 'questionable' is going to end up being all over > the distro and diluting the value of the tag. > > Let me put it this way - if we start randomly rating things in a provides > tag and gnaughty or hot-babe or pr0n-comfort get labeled this way then > I'll make sure I personally add the same tag to: > > - firefox > - yum > - sword > - gnome-sword And every email client, because I'm spammed by countless messages offering adult content every day :-( Daniel -- |: Red Hat, Engineering, London -o- http://people.redhat.com/berrange/ :| |: http://libvirt.org -o- http://virt-manager.org -o- http://ovirt.org :| |: http://autobuild.org -o- http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ :| |: GnuPG: 7D3B9505 -o- F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 :| -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
